Although there are criticisms that Cinebench-which uses Maxon's graphics rendering software-is narrowly focused, we find that it both accentuates differences between CPUs and hews more closely to both real-world expectations and the Passmark general-purpose benchmark than Geekbench does.Īpple's M1 comes out firmly on top of both the quad-core/octa-thread i7-1185G7 and octa-core/octa-thread Ryzen 7 4700U in unlimited multicore testing. Updated 4:05pm EST: Cinebench's new R23 release offers native ARM on macOS support, and we generally prefer it to Geekbench. Within Geekbench's limited world, it's clear that the M1 is a winner-it beats all comers, whether we're looking at multithreaded CPU, single-threaded CPU, or OpenCL GPU testing. And because Metal is the API Apple's devices and software are optimized for, we don't normally use its OpenCL-based GPU test at all.īut since we're looking at a brand-new architecture on a minority platform, before its retail launch, we're very limited on shiny, pre-packaged benchmark suites. It can flatten most differences in CPUs, while occasionally and unpredictably magnifying others. Geekbench is not the entire picture, of course. Geekbench 5.3.0 is one happy exception to that rule, with a brand-new version running natively on Apple Silicon macOS and in the App Store already. Unfortunately, not all benchmark suites run on macOS, very few run on Apple Silicon, and very little along those lines runs on macOS 11 on Apple Silicon. It's very frustrating trying to get a direct performance comparison between the M1 and its x86-64 competition-in our device reviews, we normally lean pretty heavily on general-purpose, synthetic benchmark suites that run a wide array of tests against a platform and come up with a simple numeric score. The M1 is designed from the ground up to be powerful and rather compromise-free competition for traditional PC architecture. But ARM has been coming for the desktop space as well, albeit more slowly-and mostly on the very low end, as we've seen in devices such as the Pinebook Pro.Īpple's new M1 system-on-a-chip (SoC) is decidedly not one of those low-performance, low-cost efforts. In these form factors, performance-and the ability to run a familiar operating system and software stack, with zero compromise-has been the most important criterion. From there, ARM began encroaching on the datacenter, and for the same reasons-even though individual ARM processors generally underperformed their x86 equivalents, they got the same amount of work done with lower power and cooling bills necessary.ĭesktop and traditional laptop PCs are something of a last bastion for the x86-64 architecture. That power efficiency advantage led ARM to an early and crushing victory in the ultramobile space-phones and tablets-where milliwatts saved matter more than raw performance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |